Suffolk Region Residents Oppose Connection of Slots at Suffolk Downs
Competitors in the extension of the casino at a Suffolk that is existing Downs informed regional media that they’re planning to test in legal a vote concern which will eventually cause the facilities of a slot machines parlor in the Boston-located track.
Earlier on this Revere and East Boston residents filed onlinecasinoelite.com a complaint to the Supreme Judicial Court, saying that the ballot measure should have not been certified by Massachusetts Secretary of State William F. Galvin and Attorney General Maura Healey week. Neighborhood communities bring previously prevented two plans for any addition of the casino during the track from getting materialized.
This would result in the current state gambling law being amended so that it allows the establishment of a second slots parlor within Massachusetts’ borders if voters approve the ballot question. Introduced in 2011, the state casino rules enables one slots parlor, the main one in Plainville, and three fully-fledged casinos are founded.
Adversaries associated with the possible next slots parlor debated that their state Attorney standard needs perhaps not given the green light on to a ballot matter for a local question. Relating to all of them, the language for the question got designed in a fashion that used especially for the place around the horse track that is existing. If recommended, it would permit the choice of a 4-acre slot machines parlor within 1,500 base associated with Suffolk Downs that is existing site.